David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):71-87 (2009)
abstract The paper, using Spielberg's Munich as a test case, argues that the theory of ethicism – the view that a work of art's moral point of view affects the work's overall aesthetic evaluation – has serious restricted applicability owing to a number of reasons. Ethicism does not apply to works of art (1) that have no moral content; (2) that do have moral content but whose prescribed responses are non-moral; (3) whose prescribed moral responses do not ask the audience to accept or reject the moral claim but merely to contemplate or entertain it; (4) whose prescribed moral responses assert moral claims that are indeterminate; and (5) whose prescribed moral responses are embodied in equally plausible or true but incompatible interpretations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cass R. Sunstein (2005). On Moral Intuitions and Moral Heuristics: A Response. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
James A. Ryan (1998). Moral Philosophy and Moral Psychology in Mencius. Asian Philosophy 8 (1):47 – 64.
James Harold (2011). Autonomism Reconsidered. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):137-147.
P. S. Greenspan (1998). Moral Responses and Moral Theory: Socially-Based Externalist Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 2 (2):103-122.
I. B. Beddoe (1981). Perceptions of Teachers About Moral Education in Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Moral Education 10 (2):95-108.
Andrew Cullison (2010). Moral Perception. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):159-175.
James Harold (2006). On Judging the Moral Value of Narrative Artworks. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2):259–270.
Katherine Thomson (2002). Aesthetic and Ethical Mediocrity in Art. Philosophical Papers 31 (2):199-215.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #333,274 of 1,932,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,270 of 1,932,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?