Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 19 (1-3):153 - 165 (1983)
|Abstract||The purpose of this article is to try to get a clearer picture of a criterion which may be used to distinguish between genuine names of objects and pseudo-names, between names of existent and non-existent objects, between facts and fictitious states of affairs. Meinong's idea of incomplete objects serves as the theoretical notion for the description of fictitious objects. The distinction between imported (immigrant) and native objects in fiction is denied and a necessary connection between fictious and real objects maintained.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. Geoffrey Hall (2009). Proper Names in Early Word Learning: Rethinking a Theoretical Account of Lexical Development. Mind and Language 24 (4):404-432.
Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
Andrej Krause (2008). Über Das Verhältnis Allgemeiner Und Individueller Materieller Und Mathematischer Gegenstände Nach Thomas Von Aquin. Vivarium 46 (2):155-174.
Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Edward N. Zalta (2003). Referring to Fictional Characters. Dialectica 57 (2):243–254.
Alberto Voltolini (1994). Ficta Versus Possibilia. Grazer Philosophische Studien 48:75-104.
Charles Crittenden (1973). Thinking About Non-Being. Inquiry 16 (1-4):290 – 312.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,981 of 738,751 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?