Hochberg on what is `fitting' for Ewing and hall
Mind 67 (265):104-106 (1958)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoger T. Ames (2002). Remembering David Hall: David L. Hall (1937-2001). Philosophy East and West 52 (3):277-280.
John Knox Jr (1975). A. C. Ewing: A Critical Survey of Ewing's Recent Work. Religious Studies 11 (2):229 - 255.
A. C. Ewing (1935). On Dr. Ewing's Neglect of Bradley's Theory of Internal Relations: Reply. Journal of Philosophy 32 (10):273.
Joel Marks (2010). Live Free or Die. [REVIEW] Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
M. S. Hall & R. W. Hall (1983). Platonism in Hooker. Apeiron 17 (1):48 - 56.
Mathias Frisch (2010). Causes, Counterfactuals, and Non-Locality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):655-672.
Herbert Hochberg (1956). `Fitting' as a Semantical Predicate. Mind 65 (260):530-533.
Jonas Olson (2009). Fitting Attitude Analyses of Value and the Partiality Challenge. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):365 - 378.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
