David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 32 (5):619-644 (2013)
This paper examines a rarely-discussed argument for the right to bequeath wealth. This argument, popular among libertarians, asserts that opposition to the practice of inheritance is prone to over-generalize, such that opponents of inheritance cannot avoid condemning other uses of private property, like gift-giving. The argument is motivated by an interesting methodological claim, namely, that the morality of bequest ought to be evaluated from the perspective of the donor, and not evaluated in ways that invoke the effects of bequest on the distribution of wealth. This paper argues that this donor-centric approach ultimately favors restricting the right of bequest. Specifically, I maintain that bequest generally carries a lower opportunity cost than other uses of property. Accordingly, inheritance tax is less coercive than other taxes, and bequest is less obviously as generous an act as gift giving. While the arguments made here will encourage traditional opponents of inheritance (such as egalitarians), I also suggest why they might be welcomed by at least some types of libertarian
|Keywords||Taxation Libertarianism Bequest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Halliday (2013). Justice and Taxation. Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1111-1122.
Similar books and articles
S. Stewart Braun (2010). Historical Entitlement and the Practice of Bequest: Is There a Moral Right of Bequest? [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 29 (6):695-715.
Jeremy Waldron (1981). Locke's Account of Inheritance and Bequest. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (1):39-51.
Ann Mumford, Inheritance in Socio-Political Context: The Case for Reviving the Sociological Discourse of Inheritance Tax Law.
Lily L. Batchelder, What Should Society Expect From Heirs? A Proposal for a Comprehensive Inheritance Tax.
Ehud Lamm, Inheritance Systems. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition).
J. F. Horty, R. H. Thomason & D. S. Touretzky (1990). A Sceptical Theory of Inheritance in Nonmonotonic Semantic Networks. Artificial Intelligence 42:311-348.
Richmond H. Thomason & John F. Horty, A Clash of Intuitions: The Current State of Nonmonotonic Multiple Inheritance Systems.
Carla E. Kary (1982). Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended From Biology to Epistemology? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
Matteo Mameli (2005). The Inheritance of Features. Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):365-399.
John J. McDermott (1984). Classical American Philosophy: A Reflective Bequest to the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Philosophy 81 (11):663-675.
Karl Widerquist (2009). A Dilemma for Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):43-72.
Luc Steels (2007). Is Symbolic Inheritance Similar to Genetic Inheritance? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):376-377.
Ivar Hannikainen (2010). Questioning the Causal Inheritance Principle. Theoria 25 (3):261-277.
Added to index2012-09-19
Total downloads12 ( #130,070 of 1,102,845 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,523 of 1,102,845 )
How can I increase my downloads?