Private property and environmental ethics:. Some new directions
Metaphilosophy 39 (3):402–421 (2008)
| Abstract | This article argues that teachers of environmental ethics must more aggressively entertain questions of private property in their work and in their teaching. To make this case, it first introduces the three primary positions on property: occupation arguments, labor theory of value arguments, and efficiency arguments. It then contextualizes these arguments in light of the contemporary U.S. wise-use movement, in an attempt to make sense of the concerns that motivate wise-use activists, and also to demonstrate how intrinsic value arguments miss the mark. Finally, it offers some suggestions about further directions for environmental ethics, reasoning that there is a good deal of headway to be gained for environmental ethics by accepting that nature can be owned as property, but nevertheless engaging the idea of private property critically. | |||||||||
| Keywords | ||||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
B. Andrew Lustig (1993). Property, Justice, and the Common Good: A Response to Paul J. Weithman. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):181 - 187.
Jan Narveson (1995). The Case for Free Market Environmentalism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2).
L. Wenar (1998). Original Acquisition of Private Property. Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Mark Sagoff (1979). Private Property and the Constitution. Environmental Ethics 1 (1):89-96.
Tony Smith (1995). The Case Against Free Market Environmentalism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2).
Jeremy Waldron (1990). The Right to Private Property. Clarendon Press.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

