David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Public Health Ethics 3 (2):157-166 (2010)
This paper addresses whether universal, general education programs are enough to satisfy basic criteria of human rights, or whether comprehensive family planning programs, in conjunction with universal education programs, might also be morally required. Even before the Reagan administration instituted the ‘global gag rule’ at the 1984 conference in Mexico City, prohibiting funding to nongovernmental organizations that included providing information about abortion as a possible method of family planning, the moral acceptability of family planning programs has been called into question. This paper makes a moral argument for family planning by appealing to both data and to theory: data about the efficacy of universal and comprehensive family planning education programs at reducing fertility and infant mortality, and theory about what is required for the establishment of autonomy. It reasons that universal educational programs are insufficient for the promotion of autonomy, and therefore argues on substantive autonomy grounds for comprehensive family planning programs in addition to universal education programs
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Eric Thomas Weber (2008). Dewey and Rawls on Education. Human Studies 31 (4):361 - 382.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jason Stansbury & Bruce Barry (2007). Ethics Programs and The Paradox of Control. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (2):239-261.
Peter Grantham (1981). Ethical Issues and the Family Doctor. Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):180-189.
Rebecca A. Reisch (2011). International Service Learning Programs: Ethical Issues and Recommendations. Developing World Bioethics 11 (2):93-98.
Steven N. Brenner (1992). Ethics Programs and Their Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):391-399.
Stefan Mann (2005). Ethological Farm Programs and the “Market” for Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):369-382.
Thomas F. Mcgovern (1998). Vulnerability: Reflection on its Ethical Implications for the Protection of Participants in SAMHSA Programs. Ethics and Behavior 8 (4):293 – 304.
Norden & Gary J. Dean (2003). Thinking Critically About the Assessment of Adult Students in Even Start Family Literacy Programs. Inquiry 23 (1-2):31-38.
Arlene S. Kanter, Permanency Planning for Children with Disabilities: Enforcing the Right of All Children to Live with a Family.
Zbigniew Bańkowski, J. Barzelatto & Alexander Morgan Capron (eds.) (1989). Ethics and Human Values in Family Planning: Conference Highlights, Papers, and Discussion: Xxii Cioms Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 19-24 June 1988. [REVIEW] Cioms.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads5 ( #230,195 of 1,102,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,567 of 1,102,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?