Real numbers, quantities, and measurement

Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):304-323 (2002)
Defining the real numbers by abstraction as ratios of quantities gives prominence to then- applications in just the way that Frege thought we should. But if all the reals are to be obtained in this way, it is necessary to presuppose a rich domain of quantities of a land we cannot reasonably assume to be exemplified by any physical or other empirically measurable quantities. In consequence, an explanation of the applications of the reals, defined in this way, must proceed indirectly. This paper explains the main complications involved and answers the main objections advanced in Batitsky's paper in this issue.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/10.3.304
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,305
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (2006). What is Neologicism? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):60-99.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

49 ( #97,730 of 1,932,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #94,381 of 1,932,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.