Synthese 101 (2):273-289 (1994)
|Abstract||One of the most common views about self-deception ascribes contradictory beliefs to the self-deceiver. In this paper it is argued that this view (the contradiction strategy) is inconsistent with plausible common-sense principles of belief attribution. Other dubious assumptions made by contradiction strategists are also examined. It is concluded that the contradiction strategy is an inadequate account of self-deception. Two other well-known views — those of Robert Audi and Alfred Mele — are investigated and found wanting. A new theory of self-deception relying on an extension of Mark Johnston's subintentional mental tropisms is proposed and defended|
|Keywords||Belief Epistemology Self-deception Audi, R Johnston, M Mele, A|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele (1988). Self-Deception and Akratic Belief: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):201-206.
Ariela Lazar (1997). Self-Deception and the Desire to Believe. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):119-120.
José Eduardo Porcher (2012). Against the Deflationary Account of Self-Deception. Humana.Mente 20:67-84.
Alfred R. Mele (1982). 'Self-Deception, Action, and Will': Comments. Erkenntnis 18 (2):159-164.
Eric Funkhouser (2005). Do the Self-Deceived Get What They Want? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):295-312.
Neil Van Leeuwen (2007). The Product of Self-Deception. Erkenntnis 67 (3):419 - 437.
Kent Bach (1997). Thinking and Believing in Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):105-105.
Alfred R. Mele (1983). Self-Deception. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (October):366-377.
Robert Audi (1997). Self-Deception Vs. Self-Caused Deception: A Comment on Professor Mele. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #28,875 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,873 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?