Set representations required for the acquisition of the “natural number” concept
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):655-656 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Strauss (1991). Arithmetical Set Theory. Studia Logica 50 (2):343 - 350.
Helen De Cruz (2008). An Extended Mind Perspective on Natural Number Representation. Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):475 – 490.
Lieven Decock (2008). The Conceptual Basis of Numerical Abilities: One-to-One Correspondence Versus the Successor Relation. Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):459 – 473.
Wim Fias & Tom Verguts (2008). Not All Basic Number Representations Are Analog: Place Coding as a Precursor of the Natural Number System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):650-651.
Dunja Jutronic (2001). Is There a Third Way of Concept Acquisition? Acta Analytica 16 (26):97-108.
Jean-François le Ny (1990). Cognitive Science and Semantic Representations. Theoria 5 (1):85-106.
John Sarnecki (2006). Retracing Our Steps: Fodor's New Old Way with Concept Acquisition. Acta Analytica 21 (40):41-73.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads25 ( #49,521 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
