David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Axiomathes 21 (4):597 - 597 (2011)
How are philosophical questions about what kinds of things there are to be understood and how are they to be answered? This paper defends broadly Fregean answers to these questions. Ontological categories—such as object , property , and relation —are explained in terms of a prior logical categorization of expressions, as singular terms, predicates of varying degree and level, etc. Questions about what kinds of object, property, etc., there are are, on this approach, reduce to questions about truth and logical form: for example, the question whether there are numbers is the question whether there are true atomic statements in which expressions function as singular terms which, if they have reference at all, stand for numbers, and the question whether there are properties of a given type is a question about whether there are meaningful predicates of an appropriate degree and level. This approach is defended against the objection that it must be wrong because makes what there depend on us or our language. Some problems confronting the Fregean approach—including Frege’s notorious paradox of the concept horse—are addressed. It is argued that the approach results in a modest and sober deflationary understanding of ontological commitments.
|Keywords||Category Deflationary Existence Frege Logical Object Ontological Predicate Property Quine Relation Singular term|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. V. Quine (1960). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Willard Van Orman Quine, Patricia Smith Churchland & Dagfinn Føllesdal (2013). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
David Lewis (1983). New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (December):343-377.
John Heil (2003). From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard Gaskin (forthcoming). From the Unity of the Proposition to Linguistic Idealism. Synthese:1-18.
Robert Trueman (2015). The Concept Horse with No Name. Philosophical Studies 172 (7):1889-1906.
Similar books and articles
Richard Gaskin (2008). The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford University Press.
Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (2009). Focus Restored: Comments on John MacFarlane. Synthese 170 (3):457 - 482.
Friederike Moltmann (2016). The Number of Planets, a Number-Referring Term? In Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism. Oxford University Press 113-129.
Karen Green (2006). A Pinch of Salt for Frege. Synthese 150 (2):209 - 228.
Øystein Linnebo & David Nicolas (2008). Superplurals in English. Analysis 68 (299):186–197.
Bob Hale (2011). Erratum To: The Bearable Lightness of Being. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 21 (4):597-597.
Added to index2010-06-19
Total downloads133 ( #29,982 of 1,934,364 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #39,220 of 1,934,364 )
How can I increase my downloads?