The sociological deficit of the open society, analyzed and remedied
In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Mark A. Notturno (1999). The Open Society and its Enemies: Authority, Community, and Bureaucracy. In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
Wenda K. Bauchspies (2006). Science, Technology, and Society: A Sociological Approach. Blackwell Pub..
John Levi Martin & Matt George (2006). Theories of Sexual Stratification: Toward an Analytics of the Sexual Field and a Theory of Sexual Capital. Sociological Theory 24 (2):107 - 132.
Neil P. Hurley (1966). The Open Society. Thought 41 (4):589-599.
Brian Z. Tamanaha (2001). A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford University Press.
John A. Hall (1997). Social Foundations of Openness. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):24-38.
John Watkins (1999). A Whiff of Hegel in the Open Society? In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
Marko Ahteensuu (2012). Assumptions of the Deficit Model Type of Thinking: Ignorance, Attitudes, and Science Communication in the Debate on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):295-313.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

