Was Nietzsche a Consequentialist?

Abstract In this paper I argue that Nietzsche is a consequentialist, and that his acceptance of the distinction between intrinsic and instrumental value underwrites his investigations into the value of truth and the value of morality. His famous criticisms of utilitarianism are criticisms not of the structure of the theory, but of happiness as the "summum bonum". Nietzsche offers instead that it is life that has intrinsic value. The relationships among his consequentialism and his thoughts on virtue and the experimental life are also explored, and found to form a coherent whole.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Alastair Norcross (1997). Consequentialism and Commitment. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):380–403.
    Steven D. Hales (1996). Nietzsche on Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):819-835.
    Aaron Ridley (2005). Vi *-Nietzsche and the Re-Evaluation of Values. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):155-175.
    Douglas W. Portmore (2007). Consequentializing Moral Theories. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):39–73.
    Charles H. Pence (2011). Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Critique of Darwin. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (2):165-190.
    Robert Guay (2009). Nietzsche, Contingency, and the Vacuity of Politics. In Jeffrey A. Metzger (ed.), Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Philosophy of the Future. Continuum.
    Robert Guay (2009). Nietzsche, Contingency, and the Vacuity of Politics. In Jeffrey A. Metzger (ed.), Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Philosophy of the Future. Continuum.
    Elinor Mason (1999). Do Consequentialists Have One Thought Too Many? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):243-261.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-06

    Total downloads

    11 ( #99,650 of 550,273 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,425 of 550,273 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums