Love as a contested concept
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (3):239–254 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSimon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Rolf Johnson (2000). The Meaning of 'Love'. Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):245-254.
Eric Reitan (2001). Rape as an Essentially Contested Concept. Hypatia 16 (2):43-66.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2011). Law is Not (Best Considered) an Essentially Contested Concept. International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Andrew Mason (1990). On Explaining Political Disagreement: The Notion of an Essentially Contested Concept. Inquiry 33 (1):81 – 98.
Samantha Miles (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused? Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):285-298.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #62,387 of 556,790 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,790 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
