Graduate studies at Western
Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1):135-16 (1993)
|Abstract||Sacrificing one's own interests in order to serve another is, in general, supposed to be a good thing, an example of altruism, the hallmark of morality, and something we should commend to (but not always require of) the entirely-too-selfish human beings of our society. But let me recount a story that I hope will persuade the reader to start questioning this conventional philosophical wisdom. Last year, a friend of mine was talking with me about a mutual acquaintance whose two sons were in the same nursery school as our sons. This woman, whom I will call Terry, had been pregnant with twins, but one of the twins had died during the fourth month of pregnancy, and the other twin had just been born prematurely at six months with a host of medical problems. We were discussing how stressful this woman's life had been while she was pregnant: she was a housewife, and her two boys, aged three and five, were lively, challenging, often unruly--a real handful to raise. Her husband worked long hours in a law firm, so the vast majority of the childcare and household chores fell on her shoulders. "You could see that she was exhausted by end of the first trimester," I maintained, "because her eyes were tired, and her cheeks were sunken--she looked almost like a cadaver." My friend agreed. I went on to blame her exhaustion on the fact that she had to do too much during a pregnancy that anyone would have found difficuIt. "I don't understand her husband," I maintained. "Surely he could how badly she looked. If he had concern for his future children, why didn't he do something to help her so that the pregnancy had a chance of going better? And if he loved her, why didn't he cut down his hours so that he could help out at home? Surely he could see just by looking at her that she was in trouble," My friend said nothing at the time, but after a week she called me, and told me that my criticism of this woman's husband had bothered her all week. "You're wrong about Terry's husband not caring enough about her, They have a good marriage," she insisted, and then she continued: "You know, you're not like us, We accept the fact that we should do most of the childcare and housework..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Isabel Karpin (2012). Perfecting Pregnancy: Law, Disability, and the Future of Reproduction. Cambridge University Press.
Alfred Simon (2000). A Right to Life for the Unborn? The Current Debate on Abortion in Germany and Norbert Hoerster's Legal-Philosophical Justification for the Right to Life. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):220 – 239.
Howard Minkoff & Anne Drapkin Lyerly (2010). Samantha Burton and the Rights of Pregnant Women Twenty Years After In Re A.C. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):13-15.
D. J. Cusine (1977). Artificial Insemination with the Husband's Semen After the Husband's Death. Journal of Medical Ethics 3 (4):163-165.
Mary Gilliland Husband (1898). Book Review:The Morality of Marriage, and Other Essays on the Status and Destiny of Woman. Mona Caird. [REVIEW] Ethics 9 (1):131-.
Stellan Welin (2004). Reproductive Ectogenesis: The Third Era of Human Reproduction and Some Moral Consequences. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):615-626.
Rodney Taylor (2010). Management of Post-Mortem Pregnancy: Legal and Philosophical Aspects. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):37-37.
Lindsey Porter (2012). Adoption is Not Abortion-Lite. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):63-78.
Benjamin Hale (2007). Culpability and Blame After Pregnancy Loss. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):24-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads149 ( #3,440 of 739,353 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,353 )
How can I increase my downloads?