Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):564-565 (2004)
|Abstract||In his state-of-the-art review, Gurven compares evolutionary theories of food transfers in ethnographic settings. Although this is useful, I suggest that one must first try to determine the utility of food transfers before making predictions about which parties ought to receive food. In addition, I argue that tests of kin selection theory present a special problem in food transfers.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicolaas J. Vriend (2003). 'From Exchange It Comes to Tears'. A Dutch 'Folk Theorem' Reconsidered. Theory and Decision 55 (4):315-338.
Ulrich Steinvorth (1976). I. Marx's Analysis of Commodity Exchange—a Reply to Carver. Inquiry 19 (1-4):99 – 108.
Margaret Franzen (2004). Key Variables in Tests of Food Sharing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):563-563.
Amotz Zahavi (2004). The Details of Food-Sharing Interactions – Their Cost in Social Prestige. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):570-571.
J. Barkley Rosser & L. Kramer, State-Space Estimation of Rational Bubbles in the Yen/Deutschemark Exchange Rate.
Gillian R. Brown (2004). Tolerated Scrounging in Nonhuman Primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):562-563.
Linda D. Molm (2003). Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange. Sociological Theory 21 (1):1-17.
Todd S. Mei (2009). The Preeminence of Use: Reevaluating the Relation Between Use and Exchange in Aristotle's Economic Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 523-548.
Stephen Chen & Chong Ju Choi (2005). A Social Exchange Perspective on Business Ethics: An Application to Knowledge Exchange. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (1):1 - 11.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?