Philosophy of Science 35 (1):28-44 (1968)
|Abstract||It is generally agreed that the method of explication consists in replacing a vague, presystematic notion (the explicandum) with a precise notion (the explicatum) formulated in a systematic context. However, Carnap and others who have used this and related terms appear to hold inconsistent views as to what constitutes an adequate explication. The central feature of the present explication of 'explication' is the correspondence condition: permitting the explicandum to deviate from some established "ordinary-language" conventions but, at the same time, requiring that the explicatum correspond (via an effective translation) to the chosen "definitive intension" of the explicandum. (In effect, the first stages of an explication provide an informal characterization of a vague and possibly inconsistent language convention.) The present account of explication contrasts sharply with that sketched by Quine in Word and Object (although Quine accepts a correspondence condition of a sort). The terms `explication 1 ' and `explication 2 ' are used to indicate these quite different senses of the term. In Kaplan's terminology, explication 1 is intended to remedy "external vagueness" while explication 2 is intended to remedy "internal vagueness."|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). Truth-Making Without Truth-Makers. Synthese 152 (1):21 - 46.
Seunghak Koh (2011). Li Tongxuan's Utilization of Chinese Symbolism in the Explication of the Avataṃasaka-Sūtra. Asian Philosophy 20 (2):141-158.
Christoph Baumberger & Georg Brun (2012). Identities of Artefacts. Theoria 78 (1):47-74.
Gregory Lavers (2012). On the Quinean-Analyticity of Mathematical Propositions. Philosophical Studies 159 (2):299-319.
Hilary Putnam (1957). Psychological Concepts, Explication, and Ordinary Language. Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Giovanni Boniolo (2003). Kant's Explication and Carnap's Explication. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):289-298.
Patrick Maher (2007). Explication Defended. Studia Logica 86 (2):331 - 341.
Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (1988). La Explicación Del Concepto de Reducción. Theoria 4 (1):139-161.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,771 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?