A new representation theorem for contranegative deontic logic
Studia Logica 77 (1):1 - 7 (2004)
| Abstract | The logic of an ought operator O is contranegative with respect to an underlying preference relation if it satisfies the property Op & (¬p)(¬q) Oq. Here the condition that is interpolative ((p (pq) q) (q (pq) p)) is shown to be necessary and sufficient for all -contranegative preference relations to satisfy the plausible deontic postulates agglomeration (Op & OqO(p&q)) and disjunctive division (O(p&q) Op Oq). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLeon Gumański (1980). On Deontic Logic. Studia Logica 39 (1):63 - 75.
Churn-Jung Liau (2001). A Logical Analysis of the Relationship Between Commitment and Obligation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (2):237-261.
Leon Gumański (1983). An Extension of the Deontic Calculus DSC. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):129 - 137.
Andrew J. I. Jones & Marek Sergot (1992). Deontic Logic in the Representation of Law: Towards a Methodology. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):45-64.
Richard Evans (2010). Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic. DEON 2010 10 (1):179-195.
Sven Ove Hansson (1997). Situationist Deontic Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):423-448.
Sven Ove Hansson (1990). Preference-Based Deontic Logic (PDL). Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (1):75 - 93.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
