Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76 (2004)
|Abstract||In this paper I argue that consumerautonomy does not count in favor of thelabeling of genetically modified foods (GMfoods) more than for the labeling of non-GMfoods. Further, reasonable considerationssupport the view that it is non-GM foods ratherthan GM foods that should be labeled.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alison Bailey, Jan M. Boxill, Emmett L. Bradbury, Maudemarie Clark, Samir J. Haddad & Colin M. Patrick (2003). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (4):923-928.
Ruth Chadwick (2000). Novel, Natural, Nutritious: Towards a Philosophy of Food. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):193–208.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5).
Assya Pascalev (2003). You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594.
S. K. Wertz (2005). Are Genetically Modified Foods Good for You? A Pragmatic Answer. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):129-137.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2008). Consumer Autonomy and Sufficiency of Gmf Labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4).
Paul Weirich (ed.) (2008). Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. OUP USA.
Alan Rubel & Robert Streiffer (2005). Respecting the Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,239 of 548,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?