Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):486-487 (2003)
|Abstract||The authors' review of alternative models for reading is of great value in identifying issues and progress in the field. More emphasis should be given to distinguishing between models that offer an explanation for behavior and those that merely simulate experimental data. An analysis of a model's discrete structure can allow for comparisons of models based upon their inherent dimensionality and explanatory power.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Giovanni Boniolo (2005). A Contextualized Approach to Biological Explanation. Philosophy 80 (2):219-247.
Marthe Chandler (1988). Models of Voting Behavior in Survey Research. Synthese 76 (1):25 - 48.
Sahotra Sarkar (1992). Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. Synthese 91 (3):167-94.
Lynn Santelmann (1999). The Power of Cross-Linguistic Analysis: A Key Tool for Developing Explanatory Models of Human Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1036-1037.
Frank Hindriks (2008). False Models as Explanatory Engines. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):334-360.
Alexander Rueger (2005). Perspectival Models and Theory Unification. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):579-594.
Alisa Bokulich (2011). How Scientific Models Can Explain. Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
Carl F. Craver (2006). When Mechanistic Models Explain. Synthese 153 (3):355-376.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,187 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?