Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 3 (1-4):270 – 277 (1960)
|Abstract||Many writers assume one of the major functions (if not the major function) of ethical theory is to analyze the “ordinary language”; of moral discourse. This paper argues that different social groups develop quite different concepts of values; that there are many “ordinary languages.”; What analysts often in practice arc concerned with is middle-class ethical usage. In addition, it is argued that widely accepted moral usages may be incorrect because they are based on faulty empirical generalizations, pre-scientific opinions, or socially-determined prejudices. “Ordinary language”; needs to be viewed critically, therefore, rather than to be assumed as correct.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hilary Putnam (1957). Psychological Concepts, Explication, and Ordinary Language. Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Avner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: In Defense of Ordinary Language. Harvard University Press.
Avner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Sally Parker Ryan (2010). Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument. Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Herman Tennesen (1960). Vindication of the Humpty Dumpty Attitude Towards Language. Inquiry 3 (1-4):185 – 198.
Christopher Cowley (2007). Medical Ethics, Ordinary Concepts, and Ordinary Lives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 723,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,182 )
How can I increase my downloads?