David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 3 (1-4):270 – 277 (1960)
Many writers assume one of the major functions (if not the major function) of ethical theory is to analyze the “ordinary language”; of moral discourse. This paper argues that different social groups develop quite different concepts of values; that there are many “ordinary languages.”; What analysts often in practice arc concerned with is middle-class ethical usage. In addition, it is argued that widely accepted moral usages may be incorrect because they are based on faulty empirical generalizations, pre-scientific opinions, or socially-determined prejudices. “Ordinary language”; needs to be viewed critically, therefore, rather than to be assumed as correct.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Norman Malcolm (1951). Philosophy for Philosophers. Philosophical Review 60 (3):329-340.
Gilbert Ryle (1953). Ordinary Language. Philosophical Review 62 (2):167-186.
Benson Mates (1958). On the Verification of Statements About Ordinary Language. Inquiry 1 (1-4):161 – 171.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1951). Philosophers and Ordinary Language. Philosophical Review 60 (3):317-328.
Stephen C. Pepper (1958). The Sources of Value. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hilary Putnam (1957). Psychological Concepts, Explication, and Ordinary Language. Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Christopher Cowley (2007). Medical Ethics, Ordinary Concepts, and Ordinary Lives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Herman Tennesen (1960). Vindication of the Humpty Dumpty Attitude Towards Language. Inquiry 3 (1-4):185 – 198.
Sally Parker Ryan (2010). Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument. Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Avner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads6 ( #377,465 of 1,780,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,056 of 1,780,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?