Graduate studies at Western
Sophia 48 (4):379-391 (2009)
|Abstract||Some hold that if we can imagine God creating a world in which a particular proposition (p) is true, then we can conclude that p is possible. I argue that such appeals to God can’t provide us with a guide to possibility. For either God’s powers aren’t co-extensive with the possible or they are. And if they are, these appeals either beg the question or court a version of Euthyphro’s Dilemma. Some may argue that such appeals were only intended to prompt us to think broadly about the modal claim at issue. I argue instead that these appeals must be understood as more than mere prompts. For it is these appeals that would, if successful, render the conceivability principle viable.|
|Keywords||God Conceivability Possibility Euthyphro’s Dilemma|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brian Davies (2005). Thoughts About God. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:21-27.
Yujin Nagasawa (2003). God's Point of View: A Reply to Mander. Heythrop Journal 44 (1):60-63.
Yujin Nagasawa (2003). God's Point of View: A Reply to Mander. Heythrop Journal 44 (1):60–63.
Otavio Bueno & Scott A. Shalkowski (2000). A Plea for a Modal Realist Epistemology. Acta Analytica 24:175--194.
T. J. Mawson (2002). God's Creation of Morality. Religious Studies 38 (1):1-25.
Klaas J. Kraay (2011). Theism and Modal Collapse. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):361.
Michael J. Shaffer (2004). A Defeater of the Claim That Belief in God’s Existence is Properly Basic. Philo 7 (1):57-70.
Elmer L. Towns (2009). God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him. Regal Books.
Added to index2009-11-07
Total downloads24 ( #57,887 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?