David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):115–145 (1998)
It is traditionally held that our knowledge of necessity is a priori; but the familiar theories of a priori knowledge – platonism and conventionalism – have now been discredited, and replaced by either modal skepticism or a posteriori essentialism. The main thesis of this paper is that Kant's theory of a priori knowledge, when detached from his transcendental idealism, offers a genuine alternative to these unpalatable options. According to Kant's doctrine, all epistemic necessity is grounded directly or indirectly on our capacity for clear and distinct rational intuition. Insight, in turn, depends upon functions of the imagination for creating “mental models” of necessary truths. This doctrine is well exemplified by Kant's account of our knowledge of simple analytic truths
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Hanna (2005). Kant and Nonconceptual Content. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):247-290.
Masashi Kasaki & C. Jenkins (2015). The Traditional Conception of the a Priori. Synthese 192 (9):2725-2746.
Robert Hanna (2000). Why Gold is Necessarily a Yellow Metal. Kantian Review 4 (1):1-47.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Stang (2011). Did Kant Conflate the Necessary and the A Priori? Noûs 45 (3):443-471.
Avner Baz (2004). What's the Point of Calling Out Beauty? British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):57-72.
Robert N. Johnson (2008). Was Kant a Virtue Ethicist? In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtues. Walter De Gruyter
Mark Schroeder (forthcoming). What Matters About Metaethics? In Peter Singer (ed.), Does Anything Really Matter? Responses to Parfit.
Robert Hanna (2006). Kant, Science, and Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Adrian Bardon (2001). Leibniz on the Epistemic Status of the Mysteries. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):143-158.
Brian K. Powell (2006). Kant and Kantians on “the Normative Question”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):535 - 544.
Michael Dummett (1982). Frege and Kant on Geometry. Inquiry 25 (2):233 – 254.
Stanley Munsat (1971). The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. Belmont, Calif.,Wadsworth Pub. Co..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #87,119 of 1,796,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?