How not to change the theory of theory change: A reply to Tennant

A number of seminal papers on the logic of belief change by Alchourrön, Gärden-fors, and Makinson have given rise to what is now known as the AGM paradigm. The present discussion note is a response to Neil Tennant's [1994], which aims at a critical appraisal of the AGM approach and the introduction of an alternative approach. We show that important parts of Tennants's critical remarks are based on misunderstandings or on lack of information. In the course of doing this, we attend to some central philosophical issues in the theory of belief change, such as the choice of a representation for belief states and the meaning of an idealized rational agent.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/46.3.361
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Neil Tennant (1997). On Having Bad Contractions, Or: No Room for Recovery. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):241-266.
Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott (1998). A Plea for Accuracy. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 8 (3):221-224.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

56 ( #61,286 of 1,727,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #354,176 of 1,727,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.