David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):145 - 157 (2007)
Moral theory has mostly focused on idealized situations in which the morally relevant properties of human actions can be known beforehand. Here, a framework is proposed that is intended to sharpen moral intuitions and improve moral argumentation in problems involving risk and uncertainty. Guidelines are proposed for a systematic search of suitable future viewpoints for hypothetical retrospection. In hypothetical retrospection, a decision is evaluated under the assumption that one of the branches of possible future developments has materialized. This evaluation is based on the deliberator’s present values, and each decision is judged in relation to the information available when it was taken. The basic decision rule is to choose an alternative that comes out as morally acceptable (permissible) from all hypothetical retrospections.
|Keywords||hypothetical retrospection regret retrospection risk uncertainty expected utility prudence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marion Godman & Sven Ove Hansson (2009). European Public Advice on Nanobiotechnology—Four Convergence Seminars. NanoEthics 3 (1):43-59.
Sven Hansson (2011). Coping with the Unpredictable Effects of Future Technologies. Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):137-149.
Marion Godman (2008). But is It Unique to Nanotechnology? Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):391-403.
Karim Jebari & Sven-Ove Hansson (2013). European Public Deliberation on Brain Machine Interface Technology: Five Convergence Seminars. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1071-1086.
Similar books and articles
Sven Ove Hansson (2010). The Harmful Influence of Decision Theory on Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):585-593.
Susanne Bobzien (1997). The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments. Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
Anton Kühberger (2001). Why Use Real and Hypothetical Payoffs? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):419-420.
Carl Malinowski & Karen A. Berger (1996). Undergraduate Student Attitudes About Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):525 - 535.
Teddy Seidenfeld (2000). The Independence Postulate, Hypothetical and Called-Off Acts: A Further Reply to Rabinowicz. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 48 (4):319-322.
Ernest Sosa (1967). Hypothetical Reasoning. Journal of Philosophy 64 (10):293-305.
Sven Ove Hansson (1996). Decision Making Under Great Uncertainty. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):369-386.
David B. Resnik (1992). Are Methodological Rules Hypothetical Imperatives? Philosophy of Science 59 (3):498-507.
Roger R. Straughan (1975). Hypothetical Moral Situations. Journal of Moral Education 4 (3):183-189.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #131,377 of 1,679,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,917 of 1,679,344 )
How can I increase my downloads?