“More on respect for embryos and potentiality: Does respect for embryos entail respect for in vitro embryos?”
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226 (2006)
It is commonly assumed that persons who hold abortions to be generally impermissible must, for the same reasons, be opposed to embryonic stem cell research [ESR]. Yet a settled position against abortion does not necessarily direct one to reject that research. The difference in potentiality between the embryos used in ESR and embryos discussed in the abortion debate can make ESR acceptable even if one holds that abortion is impermissible. With regard to their potentiality, in vitro embryos are here argued to be more morally similar to clonable somatic cells than they are to in vivo embryos. This creates an important moral distinction between embryos in vivo and in vitro. Attempts to refute this moral distinction, raised in the recent debate in this journal between Alfonso Gómez-Lobo and Mary Mahowald, are also addressed.
|Keywords||abortion cloning embryo frozen embryo potentiality stem cell research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Don Marquis (1989). Why Abortion is Immoral. Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Richard M. Doerflinger (1999). The Ethics of Funding Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Catholic Viewpoint. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (2):137-150.
R. M. Hare (1993). Essays on Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Alastair Norcross (1990). Killing, Abortion, and Contraception: A Reply to Marquis. Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):268-277.
R. M. Hare (1975). Abortion and the Golden Rule. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (3):201-222.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aaron Simmons (2012). Do Embryos Have Interests? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66.
Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (2007). Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):239-245.
Carolyn Mcleod & Françoise Baylis (2007). Donating Fresh Versus Frozen Embryos to Stem Cell Research: In Whose Interests? Bioethics 21 (9):465–477.
Daniel Holbrook (2007). All Embryos Are Equal?: Issues in Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis, IVF Implantation, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Therapeutic Cloning. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):43-53.
Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (2006). Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos. Journal of Philosophical Research (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245.
Carolyn McLeod & Françoise Baylis (2006). Feminists on the Inalienability of Human Embryos. Hypatia 21 (1):1-14.
Howard J. Curzer (2004). The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.
David A. Jensen (2008). Abortion, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Waste. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):27-41.
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2005). On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2004). Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #122,257 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #82,997 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?