Review of James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (10) (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCharles B. Daniels & James B. Freeman (1977). Classical Second-Order Intensional Logic with Maximal Propositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):1 - 31.
James B. Freeman (1991). Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure. Foris Publications.
James B. Freeman (2007). Arguments About Arguments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):525-540.
Guillaume Aucher (2010). An Internal Version of Epistemic Logic. Studia Logica 94 (1).
Andrew Aberdein (2006). Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques From Informal Logic. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.
Victoria F. Shaw (1996). The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1):51 – 80.
Ralph H. Johnson (1999). The Relation Between Formal and Informal Logic. Argumentation 13 (3):265-274.
James B. Freeman (2005). Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads38 ( #30,956 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
