Reconsidering the received view of the 'received view': Kant, Kuhn, and the demise of positivist philosophy of science
Graduate studies at Western
Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):169 – 173 (2003)
|Abstract||This Article does not have an abstract|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frederick Suppe (2000). Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):115.
Robert Piercey (2003). Active Mimesis and the Art of History of Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):29-42.
A. David Kline (2006). On Complicity Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):257-264.
Donald P. Smith (2003). Kant on the Dependency of the Cosmological Argument on the Ontological Argument. European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):206–218.
Kenneth Aizawa & Carl Gillett, Multiple Realization and Methodology in the Neurological and Psychological Sciences.
Frederick Suppe (1972). What's Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories? Philosophy of Science 39 (1):1-19.
Matti Eklund (2000). The Aims of Logical Empiricism As a Philosophy of Science. Acta Analytica 15 (25):137-59.
Mario Bacelar Valente (2011). Are Virtual Quanta Nothing but Formal Tools? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):39 - 53.
Sebastian Lutz (2012). On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View. HOPOS 2 (1):77–120.
John Beatty (1980). What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #33,801 of 739,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?