Reconsidering the received view of the 'received view': Kant, Kuhn, and the demise of positivist philosophy of science
Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):169 – 173 (2003)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrederick Suppe (2000). Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):115.
Robert Piercey (2003). Active Mimesis and the Art of History of Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):29-42.
A. David Kline (2006). On Complicity Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2).
Donald P. Smith (2003). Kant on the Dependency of the Cosmological Argument on the Ontological Argument. European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):206–218.
Frederick Suppe (1972). What's Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories? Philosophy of Science 39 (1):1-19.
Matti Eklund (2000). The Aims of Logical Empiricism As a Philosophy of Science. Acta Analytica 15:137-59.
Mario Bacelar Valente (2011). Are Virtual Quanta Nothing but Formal Tools? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):39 - 53.
Sebastian Lutz (2012). On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View. HOPOS 2 (1):77–120.
John Beatty (1980). What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads39 ( #29,866 of 549,600 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,600 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
