Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):423-448 (1997)
|Abstract||Situationist deontic logic is a model of that fraction of normative discourse which refers to only one situation and one set of alternatives. As we can see from a whole series of well-known paradoxes, standard deontic logic (SDL) is seriously mistaken even at the situationist level. In this paper it is shown how a more realistic deontic logic can be based on the assumption that prescriptive predicates satisfy the property of contranegativity. A satisfactory account of situation-specific norms is a necessary prerequisite for a successful treatment of more complex normative structures|
|Keywords||deontic logic norms situations preference logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leon Gumański (1983). An Extension of the Deontic Calculus DSC. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):129 - 137.
José Carmo & Andrew J. I. Jones (1996). Deontic Database Constraints, Violation and Recovery. Studia Logica 57 (1):139 - 165.
Juliano S. A. Maranhão (2009). Von Wright's Therapy to Jørgensen's Syndrome. Law and Philosophy 28 (2):163 - 201.
Albert J. J. Anglberger (2008). Dynamic Deontic Logic and its Paradoxes. Studia Logica 89 (3):427 - 435.
Mathieu Beirlaen, Christian Straßer & Joke Meheus (2013). An Inconsistency-Adaptive Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):285-315.
Richard Evans (2010). Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic. DEON 2010 10 (1):179-195.
Sven Ove Hansson (1990). Preference-Based Deontic Logic (PDL). Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (1):75 - 93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,807 of 739,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?