Acta Analytica 24 (1):33-42 (2009)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to explain how the Heraclitean doctrine of universal flux must be rejected, while the notion of flux should and can be preserved. Against the reductionist account of subjectless change, a modern version of the Heraclitean doctrine advocated by revisionist metaphysics, I argue that (1) the idea of subjectless change is one that can and should be formulated in the established conceptual framework, and (2) subjectlessness is a feature that most aptly characterizes material changes. In essence, I seek to provide a proper accommodation for the notion of flux in a conceptual framework that is traditionally understood (or rather misunderstood) as decidedly excluding it.|
|Keywords||Flux Subjectless change Process Event theory Conceptual scheme Reductionism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yvan Lagadeuc (2005). Nutrient Fluxes Toward Phytoplankton: Is It Useful to Consider Turbulence Intermittency? Acta Biotheoretica 53 (4).
Charles H. Kahn (2007). Why Is the "Sophist" a Sequel to the "Theaetetus"? Phronesis 52 (1):33 - 57.
Satkari[from old catalog] Mookerjee (1935). The Buddhist Philosophy of Universal Flux. [Calcutta]University of Calcutta.
Mark Perlman (2000). Conceptual Flux: Mental Representation, Misrepresentation, and Concept Change. Kluwer.
Jean Cristofol (2012). Elephant Fish and GPS. AI and Society 27 (2):183-187.
Anthony K. Jensen (2010). Nietzsche's Interpretation of Heraclitus in Its Historical Context. Epoché 14 (2):335-362.
Matthew Colvin (2007). Heraclitean Flux and Unity of Opposites in Plato's Theaetetus and Cratylus. The Classical Quarterly 57 (02).
Peter Caws (1996). The Flux of History and the Flux of Science. International Studies in Philosophy 28 (4):122-123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #46,355 of 722,838 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,838 )
How can I increase my downloads?