David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (1):134-141 (2010)
If modernity is manifested as essentialism, postmodernity is manifested as anti-essentialism. Modernity is, in essence, human beings’ discovery of their own power, and is based on rational knowledge that has grasped the essence of things. In fact, in the discourse system of modernity, the various concepts of “essence” connote nothing but people’s imaginative constructions and rational conjectures about objects. In the past, our order, be it internal or external, was in essence guaranteed by God. Afterwards, all “essences”, as essences, must rationally prove the reason for their existence. In the postmodern context and discourse system, God, and also the “human being” who has created essence, has “died”. We should not simply resume the belief in traditional essence, but should reconstruct, on the basis of a full understanding of the intellectual meaning of postmodernity’s challenges, some historicity, practicality, and the concept of essence that accords with the historical as well as communicative rationality. We must realize that the essence of things is the essence of particular things in a particular stage of development, internally containing infinite differences and variety. Only things with postmodern traits contain modernity, and only the concept of essence that conceives difference accords with time.
|Keywords||essence modernity postmodernism reflection|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. M. Ziman (1978). Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science. Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Maurice Wallerstein (2004). The Uncertainties of Knowledge. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dezhi Duan (2007). Aquinas' Transcendences to Aristotle in the Doctrine of Essence. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):572-582.
Frank Lucash (2006). What is the Relationship Between Ideas in the Human Mind and Ideas in the Mind of God for Spinoza? Sophia 45 (1):25-41.
Diana J. Fuss (1989). "Essentially Speaking": Luce Irigaray's Language of Essence. Hypatia 3 (3):62 - 80.
Sherry Deveaux (2003). The Divine Essence and the Conception of God in Spinoza. Synthese 135 (3):329 - 338.
S. Marc Cohen (1978). Individual and Essence in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Paideia (Special Aristotle Edition):75-85.
Shiying Zhang (2009). The Double Meanings of “Essence”: The Natural and Humane Sciences — a Tentative Linkage of Hegel, Dilthey, and Husserl. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):143-155.
David S. Oderberg (2011). Essence and Properties. Erkenntnis 75 (1):85-111.
David S. Oderberg (2007). Real Essentialism. Routledge.
Peter King (2005). Duns Scotus on Singular Essences. Medioevo 30:111-137.
Added to index2010-02-15
Total downloads16 ( #163,765 of 1,724,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,173 of 1,724,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?