David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 52 (2):179 – 214 (2009)
Nietzsche's views on knowledge have been interpreted in at least three incompatible ways - as transcendental, naturalistic or proto-deconstructionist. While the first two share a commitment to the possibility of objective truth, the third reading denies this by highlighting Nietzsche's claims about the necessarily falsifying character of human knowledge (his so-called error theory). This paper examines the ways in which his work can be construed as seeking ways of overcoming the strict opposition between naturalism and transcendental philosophy whilst fully taking into account the error theory (interpreted non-literally, as a hyperbolic warning against uncritical forms of realism). In doing so, it clarifies the nature of Nietzsche's ontological commitments, both in the early and the later work, and shows that his relation to transcendental idealism is more subtle than is allowed by naturalistic interpreters while conversely accounting for the impossibility of conceiving the conditions of the possibility of knowledge as genuinely a priori.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Graham Bird (1973). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. New York, Humanities Press.
Maudemarie Clark (1990). Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Maudmarie Clark (2010). Nietzsche. In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge.
Christoph Cox (1995). Nietzsche, Naturalism, and Interpretation. International Studies in Philosophy 27 (3):3-18.
Arthur Coleman Danto (1965/1980). Nietzsche as Philosopher. Columbia University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dermot Moran (2008). Husserl's Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):401-425.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2004). ‘Must the Transcendental Conditions for the Possibility of Experience Be Ideal?’. In C. Ferrini (ed.), Eredità Kantiane (1804–2004): questioni emergenti e problemi irrisolti. Bibliopolis.
Béatrice Han (2002). Foucault's Critical Project: Between the Transcendental and the Historical. Stanford University Press.
David Roden (2005). Naturalising Deconstruction. Continental Philosophy Review 38 (1-2):71-88.
Nadeem J. Z. Hussain (2004). Nietzsche's Positivism. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):326–368.
John R. White (2008). Divine Light and Human Wisdom: Transcendental Elements in Bonaventure's Illumination Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):175-185.
Jamin Asay (2010). How to Express Ontological Commitment in the Vernacular. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):293-310.
Carl B. Sachs (2008). Nietzsche's Daybreak. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):81-100.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads32 ( #59,710 of 1,140,016 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #64,318 of 1,140,016 )
How can I increase my downloads?