Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 78 (4):899-919 (2013)
|Abstract||This paper explores how the purpose of the concept of knowledge affects knowledge ascriptions in natural language. I appeal to the idea that the role of the concept of knowledge is to flag reliable informants, and I use this idea to illuminate and support contextualism about ‘knows’. I argue that practical pressures that arise in an epistemic state of nature provide an explanatory basis for a brand of contextualism that I call ‘practical interests contextualism’. I also answer some questions that contextualism leaves open, particularly why the concept of knowledge is valuable, why the word ‘knows’ exhibits context-variability, and why this term enjoys such widespread use. Finally, I show how my contextualist framework accommodates plausible ideas from two rival views: subject-sensitive invariantism and insensitive invariantism. This provides new support for contextualism and develops this view in a way that improves our understanding of the concept of knowledge|
|Keywords||contextualism knowledge practical explication epistemology Edward Craig|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robin McKenna (2013). Epistemic Contextualism: A Normative Approach. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):101-123.
Timothy Williamson (2005). Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):213–235.
Matthew Chrisman (2007). From Epistemic Contextualism to Epistemic Expressivism. Philosophical Studies 135 (2):225 - 254.
Michael Blome-Tillmann (2013). Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):89-100.
Robin McKenna (2011). Interests Contextualism. Philosophia 39 (4):741-750.
David Henderson (2009). Motivated Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):119 - 131.
Frank Hofmann (2004). Why Epistemic Contextualism Does Not Provide an Adequate Account of Knowledge: Comments on Barke. Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):375 - 382.
Elke Brendel (2005). Why Contextualists Cannot Know They Are Right: Self-Refuting Implications of Contextualism. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 20 (2):38-55.
Sarah Wright (2010). Virtues, Social Roles, and Contextualism. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):95-114.
Elke Brendel & Christoph Jäger (2004). Contextualist Approaches to Epistemology: Problems and Prospects. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):143 - 172.
Gilbert Harman (2007). Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):173–179.
Gilbert Harman (2007). Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):173-179.
John Greco (2008). What's Wrong with Contextualism? Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):416 - 436.
Patrick Rysiew, Epistemic Contextualism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Martijn Blaauw (2008). Subject Sensitive Invariantism: In Memoriam. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):318–325.
Added to index2012-12-07
Total downloads39 ( #34,832 of 739,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,453 of 739,853 )
How can I increase my downloads?