Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):7-18 (2009)
|Abstract||In this article we explore the role evidence ought to play in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). First, we consider the claim that evidence in the form of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cannot be obtained for CAMs. Second, we consider various claims to the effect that there are ways of obtaining evidence that do not make use of RCTs. We argue that there is no good reason why CAM should be exempted from the general requirement that treatments undergo evaluation by RCT. Third, we consider two implications for health care policy. First, many activities in conventional medicine have never been rigorously evaluated and are widely in use nonetheless. We argue that this fails to provide a reason for exempting CAM from a demand for evidence. Second, CAM use may be compared to a choice of lifestyle, and this has a significant impact on which requirements of evidence can reasonably be imposed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Shaw (2012). No Remedy for Homeopathy "Research&Quot;. Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 17 (4):209-10.
Edzard Ernst (2009). Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Between Evidence and Absurdity. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (2):289-303.
Monika Clark-Grill (2007). Questionable Gate-Keeping: Scientific Evidence for Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM): Response to Malcolm Parker. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):21-28.
Stephen E. Straus (2003). The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Accommodating Pluralism (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (4):608-610.
Jacqueline H. Wolf (2003). Callahan, Daniel, Ed., the Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Accommodating Pluralism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):271-277.
E. Ernst (2004). Ethical Problems Arising in Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):156-159.
Kirsten Hansen & Klemens Kappel (2012). Pre-Trial Beliefs in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Whose Pre-Trial Belief Should Be Considered? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):15-21.
David Shaw (2010). Homeopathy Is Where the Harm Is: Five Unethical Effects of Funding Unscientific Remedies. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):130-131.
David J. Hufford (2003). Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and of Scientists. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (2):198-212.
Jeremy Sugarman (2003). Informed Consent, Shared Decision-Making, and Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (2):247-250.
R. E. G. Upshur & Errol Colak (2003). Argumentation and Evidence. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (4):283-299.
Madeleine Weldon-Linne (2000). Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Legal Boundaries and Regulatory Perspectives (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43 (4):612-613.
Chidi Oguamanam (2006). From Rivalry to Rapproachement: Biomedicine, Complementary Alternative Medicine (CAM) at Ethical Crossroads. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 18 (3):245-264.
Colleen Derkatch (2008). Method as Argument: Boundary Work in Evidence-Based Medicine. Social Epistemology 22 (4):371 – 388.
Yael Keshet (2011). Hybrid Knowledge and Research on the Efficacy of Alternative and Complementary Medicine Treatments. Social Epistemology 24 (4):331-347.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads15 ( #85,963 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?