Why Cannot We Dispense with the Subject-Predicate Form without Losing Something More?

Florida Philosophy Review 9 (2):79-89 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been suggested that there may exist languages that contain only feature-placing sentences, and hence the conceptual scheme implied by such languages is radically different from the one with which we are more familiar. Contrary to what some philosophers believe, I argue that with such languages, we may not be able to say things having approximately the force of the things we actually say, that is, to express the so-called ordinary matters merely at the expense of simplicity. For one thing, in such languages not only we cannot speak of change in something, e.g., that Theaetetus grows older, but also the sense of change in the expression of change in something cannot be preserved in the feature-placing translation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maybe there are no subject-predicate sentences in chinese.Xiaoqiang Han - 2009 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (3):277-287.
Existence predicate.Reinhard Muskens - 1993 - In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. pp. 1191.
Truth as translation – part a.Hannes Leitgeb - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (4):281-307.
No problem for Aristotle's subject and predicate.Guy Politzer - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):298-299.
Frege on truth and judgment.Peter Pagin - 2001 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8 (1):1-13.
Subjetless Change Revisted.Xiaoqiang Han - 2008 - E – L O G O S 1211:24.
Superplurals in English.Øystein Linnebo & David Nicolas - 2008 - Analysis 68 (3):186–197.
Hand or Hammer? On formal and natural languages in semantics.Martin Stokhof - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):597-626.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-05

Downloads
66 (#222,838)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Some questions of ontology.Henry Laycock - 1972 - Philosophical Review 81 (1):3-42.
Language and Logic in Ancient China.Bao Zhi-Ming Chih-Ming) - 1985 - Philosophy East and West 35 (2):203-212.
A language without particulars.Ian Hacking - 1968 - Mind 77 (306):168-185.

Add more references