Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503 (1984)
|Abstract||Alexander Rosenberg (1983) has argued, contrary to his previous work in the philosophy of economics, that economics is not science, and it is merely mathematics. The following paper argues that Rosenberg fails to demonstrate either of these two claims. The questions of the predictive weakness of modern economics and the cognitive standing of abstract economic theory are discussed in detail|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George DeMartino (2010). The Economist's Oath: On the Need for and Content of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Subroto Roy (1989/1991). Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry. Routledge.
Alexander Rosenberg (1986). What Rosenberg's Philosophy of Economics is Not. Philosophy of Science 53 (1):127-132.
A. W. Coats (1995). Economics - Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Rosenberg Alexander. University of Chicago Press, 1992, Xvii + 266 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 11 (02):386-.
Alexander Rosenberg (1986). Lakatosian Consolations for Economics. Economics and Philosophy 2 (01):127-.
Alexander Rosenberg (1988). Economics is Too Important to Be Left to the Rhetoricians. Economics and Philosophy 4 (01):129-.
Alex Rosenberg (1992). Neo-Classical Economics and Evolutionary Theory: Strange Bedfellows? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:174 - 183.
Uskali Mäki (1996). Two Portraits of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):1-38.
Alexander Rosenberg (1992). Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,562 of 739,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?