Retributivism: The Right and the Good [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Law and Philosophy 32 (1):59-82 (2013)
|Abstract||Victor Tadros claims that punishment must be justified either instrumentally or on the grounds that deserved punishment is intrinisically good. However, if we have deontic reasons to punish wrongdoers then these reasons could justify punishment non-instrumentally. Morever, even if the punishment of wrongdoers is intrinsically good this fact cannot contribute to the justication of punishment because goodness is not a reason-giving property. It follows that retributivism is both true and important only if we have deontic reasons to punish. Tadros also claims that the constitutive aim of punishment is to inflict harm or suffering on offenders. On the contrary, the constitutive aim of retributive punishment is to inflict (justified) wrongs on offenders that are proportionate to the (unjustified) wrongs they commit. Indeed, punishment should involve the least harmful wrong that is proportionate to the wrongfulness of the offense, adequate to facilitate recognition, and (perhaps) conducive to deterrence|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (forthcoming). 'To Serve and Protect': The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-23.
Leo Zaibert (2013). The Instruments of Abolition, or Why Retributivism is the Only Real Justification of Punishment. Law and Philosophy 32 (1):33-58.
Larry Alexander (1983). Retributivism and the Inadvertent Punishment of the Innocent. Law and Philosophy 2 (2):233 - 246.
Douglas Husak (2013). Retributivism In Extremis. Law and Philosophy 32 (1):3-31.
Daniel Z. Korman (2003). The Failure of Trust-Based Retributivism. Law and Philosophy 22 (6):561-575.
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Nathan Hanna (2008). Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism. Law and Philosophy 27 (2):123-150.
David Wood (2010). Punishment: Consequentialism. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
George Schedler (2011). Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Nathan Hanna (forthcoming). Retributivism Revisited. Philosophical Studies.
Zachary Hoskins (2011). ''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Suzanne Uniacke (forthcoming). Punishment as Penalty. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-11.
Jami L. Anderson (1999). Annulment Retributivism: A Hegelian Theory of Punishment. Cambridge University Press 5 (4):363-388.
Jami L. Anderson (1999). A Hegelian Theory of Punishment. Legal Theory 5 (4):363-388.
D. Dolinko (1997). Retributivism, Consequentialism, and the Intrinsic Goodness of Punishment. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):507-528.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-02
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?