Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):129-148 (2009)
|Abstract||In this paper I consider the context and significance of the first instalment of Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature , Books One and Two, on the understanding and on the passions, published in 1739 without Book Three. I argue that Books One and Two taken together should be read as addressing the question of the relation between reason and passion, and place Hume's discussion in the context of a large early modern philosophical literature on the topic. Hume's goal is to show that the passions do not require government by reason, and to illustrate various ways in which the passions of social beings regulate themselves. The underlying theme of the first Treatise is thus a new theory of sociability: sympathetic sociability.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Hume, David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. Clarendon Press.
David Hume (2000). A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning Into Moral Subjects. OUP Oxford.
David Hume (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.
Mikko Tolonen (2008). Politeness, Paris and the Treatise. Hume Studies 34 (1):21-42.
Amyas Merivale (2009). Hume's Mature Account of the Indirect Passions. Hume Studies 35 (1-2):185-210.
Sean Greenberg (2008). 'Naturalism' and 'Skepticism' in Hume's Treatise of Human Nature. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):721-733.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Added to index2009-07-14
Total downloads36 ( #32,973 of 549,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?