Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):887-888 (2001)
|Abstract||Natural language processing involves a tight coupling between action (the production of language) and perception (the comprehension of language). We argue that similar theoretical principles apply to language processing as to action/perception in general. Language production is not driven solely by the speaker's intentions; language comprehension is not only input-driven; production and perception use common representations. We will relate recent findings from our language production lab to the Theory of Event Coding (TEC)'s principle of feature binding.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kirsten Malmkjær & John Williams (eds.) (1998). Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Petra Hendriks, Helen Hoop & Henriëtte Swart (2012). The Interplay Between the Speaker's and the Hearer's Perspective. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):1-5.
Arthur M. Glenberg (1999). Perceptual Symbols in Language Comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):618-619.
Francesco Ferretti & Erica Cosentino (2013). Time, Language and Flexibility of the Mind: The Role of Mental Time Travel in Linguistic Comprehension and Production. Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):24-46.
Carla Bazzanella (2002). The Significance of Context in Comprehension: The `We Case'. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 7 (3):239-254.
E. S. Savage‐Rumbaugh (1990). Language as a Cause‐Effect Communication System. Philosophical Psychology 3 (1):55-76.
Anne Cutler & Dennis Norris (1999). Sharpening Ockham's Razor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):40-41.
Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod (2004). Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #77,993 of 722,751 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,751 )
How can I increase my downloads?