Advance directives and the severely demented

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):47 – 64 (2006)
Should advance directives (ADs) such as living wills be employed to direct the care of the severely demented? In considering this question, I focus primarily on the claims of Rebecca Dresser who objects in principle to the use of ADs in this context. Dresser has persuasively argued that ADs are both theoretically incoherent and ethically dangerous. She proceeds to advocate a Best Interest Standard as the best way for deciding when and how the demented ought to be treated. I put forth a compromise position: both ADs and the Best Interest Standard have roles to play in guiding the care of the severely demented.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310500499195
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,209
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Dan W. Brock (1988). Justice and the Severely Demented Elderly. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (1):73-99.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

80 ( #59,160 of 1,941,042 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #115,122 of 1,941,042 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.