A note on John R. Searle's derivation of 'ought' from 'is'
Inquiry 8 (1-4):309-314 (1965)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGregory Mcculloch (1984). Cause in Perception: A Note on Searle's Intentionality. Analysis 44 (October):203-205.
Frederick M. Stoutland (1994). Searle's Consciousness: A Review of John Searle's The Rediscovery of the Mind. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 35 (4):245-254.
Larry Hauser, Chinese Room Argument. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dennis A. Rohatyn (1973). Searle's Derivation of 'Ought' From 'Is'. Philosophical Studies 22:121-138.
Sanford Levy (2009). Metaethical Naturalism and Thick Moral Arguments. Philo 12 (1):46-60.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (2007). Searle's Derivation of Promissory Obligation. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Intentional Acts and Insitutional Facts: Essays on John Searle's Social Ontology. Springer.
Edmund Wall (2008). Searle's Derivation, Natural Law, and Moral Relativism. Philosophia 36 (2):237-249.
Edmund Wall (2011). Problems with Searle's Derivation? Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads8 ( #123,255 of 550,967 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,967 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
