David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):137-147 (2011)
This paper has three aims: to define autonomism clearly and charitably, to offer a positive argument in its favour, and to defend a larger view about what is at stake in the debate between autonomism and its critics. Autonomism is here understood as the claim that a valuer does not make an error in failing to bring her moral and aesthetic judgements together, unless she herself values doing so. The paper goes on to argue that reason does not require the valuer to make coherent her aesthetic and moral evaluations. Finally, the paper shows that the denial of autonomism has realist commitments that autonomism does not have, and concludes that issues of value realism and irrealism are relevant to the debates about autonomism in ways that have not hitherto been recognized
|Keywords||ethics aesthetics ethicism autonomism moralism Gaut Carroll|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2012). Art, Ethics, and Critical Pluralism. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):275-293.
Similar books and articles
Rob van Gerwen (2004). Ethical Autonomism. The Work of Art as a Moral Agent. Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Noel Carroll (1998). Moderate Moralism Versus Moderate Autonomism. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (4):419-424.
Berys Nigel Gaut (2007). Art, Emotion and Ethics. Oxford University Press.
James C. Anderson & Jeffrey T. Dean (1998). Moderate Autonomism. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (2):150-166.
Rob van Gerwen (2004). Ethical Autonomism. Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Jason Simus (2009). Aesthetic and Other Theoretical Virtues in Science. American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 1 (2).
Alfred R. Mele (2005). Agnostic Autonomism Revisited. In J. Stacey Taylor (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Francisca Pérez Carreño (2006). El Valor Moral Del Arte y la Emoción (The Moral Value of Art and Emotion). Crítica 38 (114):69 - 92.
Joseph Levine (2010). The Q Factor: Modal Rationalism Versus Modal Autonomism. Philosophical Review 119 (3):365-380.
Alessandro Giovannelli (2007). The Ethical Criticism of Art: A New Mapping of the Territory. Philosophia 35 (2):117-127.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). Ethicism and Immoral Cognitivism: Gaut Versus Kieran on Art and Morality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (3):107-118.
Stephen Maitzen (2008). Anti-Autonomism Defended: A Reply to Hill. Philosophia 36 (4):567-574.
Philip Clark (2001). Velleman's Autonomism. Ethics 111 (3):580–593.
Robert Stecker (2006). Carroll's Bones. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):282-286.
George Dickie (2005). The Triumph in Triumph of the Will. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):151-156.
Added to index2011-01-08
Total downloads30 ( #57,102 of 1,098,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #79,853 of 1,098,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?