A surprise for Horwich (and some advocates of the fine-tuning argument (which does not include Horwich (as far as I know)))

Philosophical Studies 161 (2):247-261 (2012)
Abstract
The judgment that a given event is epistemically improbable is necessary but insufficient for us to conclude that the event is surprising. Paul Horwich has argued that surprising events are, in addition, more probable given alternative background assumptions that are not themselves extremely improbable. I argue that Horwich’s definition fails to capture important features of surprises and offer an alternative definition that accords better with intuition. An important application of Horwich’s analysis has arisen in discussions of fine-tuning arguments. In the second part of the paper I consider the implications for this argument of employing my definition of surprise. I argue that advocates of fine-tuning arguments are not justified in attaching significance to the fact that we are surprised by examples of fine-tuning.
Keywords Surprise  Fine-tuning  Horwich  Multiverse  Intelligent design
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,802
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
I. J. Good (1984). A Bayesian Approach in the Philosophy of Inference. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):161-166.

View all 9 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Neil A. Manson (2009). The Fine-Tuning Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
M. C. Bradley (2001). The Fine-Tuning Argument. Religious Studies 37 (4):451-466.
Phil Dowe (2003). The Coincidences of Time Travel. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):574-589.
Bradley Monton (2006). God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):405-424.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-26

Total downloads

33 ( #55,680 of 1,099,763 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #66,740 of 1,099,763 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.