Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4):67-75 (2003)
|Abstract||A "machine" is any causal physical system, hence we are machines, hence machines can be conscious. The question is: which kinds of machines can be conscious? Chances are that robots that can pass the Turing Test -- completely indistinguishable from us in their behavioral capacities -- can be conscious (i.e. feel), but we can never be sure (because of the "other-minds" problem). And we can never know HOW they have minds, because of the "mind/body" problem. We can only know how they pass the Turing Test, but not how, why or whether that makes them feel.|
|Keywords||*Artificial Intelligence *Conscious (Personality Factor) *Consciousness States|
Similar books and articles
Stevan Harnad (1984). Verifying Machines' Minds. [REVIEW] Contemporary Psychology 29:389 - 391.
Dale Jacquette (1993). Who's Afraid of the Turing Test? Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
Warren Wilner (2005). The Lone Ranger as a Metaphor for the Psychoanalytic Movement From Conscious to Unconscious Experience. Psychoanalytic Review 92 (5):759-776.
Murray Shanahan (2005). Global Access, Embodiment, and the Conscious Subject. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (12):46-66.
Colin McGinn (1987). Could a Machine Be Conscious? In Colin Blakemore & Susan A. Greenfield (eds.), Mindwaves. Blackwell.
E. Subitzky (2003). I Am a Conscious Essay. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (12):64-66.
Pierre Bonzon (2003). Conscious Behavior Through Reflexive Dialogs. In A. Günter, R. Kruse & B. Neumann (eds.), Lectures Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
John Mark Bishop (2009). Why Computers Can't Feel Pain. Minds and Machines 19 (4):507-516.
Susan J. Blackmore (2003). Consciousness in Meme Machines. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4):19-30.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads152 ( #2,568 of 556,898 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #2,631 of 556,898 )
How can I increase my downloads?