David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Do scientists agree? It is not only unrealistic to suppose that they do, but probably just as unrealistic to think that they ought to. Agreement is for what is already established scientific history. The current and vital ongoing aspect of science consists of an active and often heated interaction of data, ideas and minds, in a process one might call "creative disagreement." The "scientific method" is largely derived from a reconstruction based on selective hindsight. What actually goes on has much less the flavor of a systematic method than of trial and error, conjecture, chance, competition and even dialectic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Pontille & Didier Torny (2015). From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review. Human Studies 38 (1):57-79.
J. Scott Armstrong (1997). Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):63-84.
Similar books and articles
Brian Ribeiro (2011). Philosophy and Disagreement. Critica 43 (127):3-25.
Keith Allen (2013). Locke and Sensitive Knowledge. Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):249-266.
L. Briskman (1981). Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art. In Denis Dutton & Michael Krausz (eds.), Inquiry. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston 83 – 106.
Larry Briskman (1980). Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art. Inquiry 23 (1):83 – 106.
Rachel Laudan & Larry Laudan (1989). Dominance and the Disunity of Method: Solving the Problems of Innovation and Consensus. Philosophy of Science 56 (2):221-237.
Robert L. Williams (2002). Creative Performance in the Classroom. Inquiry 22 (1):7-20.
Francesco Amigoni, Viola Schiaffonati & Marco Somalvico (2000). A Multilevel Architecture of Creative Dynamic Agency. Foundations of Science 5 (2):157-184.
John Beatty (2006). Masking Disagreement Among Experts. Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.
Andrew Lugg (1978). Disagreement in Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 9 (2):276-292.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #180,156 of 1,907,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #341,955 of 1,907,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?