Can Jean Piaget explain the possibility of knowledge?

Synthese 65 (1):65 - 86 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that Piaget's use of the equilibrium principle cannot explain the possibility of correct understanding. That is, it cannot explain the possibility of knowledge, as opposed to simple change in belief. To make the argument, I begin by describing Piaget's explanatory model, which is known as the equilibrium principle. I then argue that correct understanding, or knowledge of any x as a case of y, requires a concept of correctness, i.e., the recognition that words and concepts apply under some conditions but not others. I try to show that because he uses the equilibrium principle as a basis for his explanation, Piaget cannot explain how a concept of correctness is acquired. Finally, I argue that to explain the possibility of knowledge, one must show how the conditions for word and concept application are determined by a community of language users. Again, I claim that Piaget's use of the equilibrium model precludes such an account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the psychogenesis of the a priori: Jean Piaget's critique of Kant.Horst Pfeiffle - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (5):487-498.
The nature and scope of genetic epistemology.Richard F. Kitchener - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):400-415.
The acquaintance principle.Malcolm Budd - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):386-392.
Piaget Today.B. Inhelder, D. de Caprona & A. Cornu-Wells (eds.) - 1987 - Lawrence Erlbaum.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#332,204)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.
The Basic Works of Aristotle. Aristotle - 2001 - New York: Modern Library. Edited by Richard McKeon.
Principles of Psychology.Herbert Spencer - 2016 - New York and London,: Wentworth Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references