David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2003)
Computers are incredible. They are one of the most important inventions of the 20th century, dramatically and irrevocably changing the way we live. That is the good news. The bad news is that there are still major limitations to computers, serious problems that not even the most powerful computers can solve. The consequences of such limitations can be serious. Too often these limits get overlooked, in the quest for bigger, better, and more powerful computers. In Computers Ltd., David Harel, best-selling author of Algorithmics, explains and illustrates one of the most fundamental, yet under-exposed facets of computers - their inherent limitations. Looking at the bad news that is proven, lasting and robust, discussing limitations that no amounts of hardware, software, talents or resources can overcome, the book presents a disturbing and provocative view of computing at the start of the 21st century. Along the way he shows just how far from perfect computers are, while shattering some of the many claims made for these machines. Though we may strive for bigger and better things in computing, we need to be realistic: computers are not omnipotent - far from it. Moreover, the problem is real and here to stay.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$3.28 used (87% off) $12.59 new (50% off) $18.42 direct from Amazon (27% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Vincent C. Müller (2009). Symbol Grounding in Computational Systems: A Paradox of Intentions. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (4):529-541.
Similar books and articles
Anna Lemańska (1996). Eksperymenty komputerowe w matematyce. Filozofia Nauki 3.
Peter Kugel (2002). Computing Machines Can't Be Intelligent (...And Turing Said So). Minds and Machines 12 (4):563-579.
James H. Moor (1999). Using Genetic Information While Protecting the Privacy of the Soul. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):257-263.
Mark Hogarth (2004). Deciding Arithmetic Using SAD Computers. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):681-691.
L.�szl� Ropolyi (1999). Life-Worlds and Social Relations in Computers. AI and Society 13 (1-2):69-87.
Bernd Carsten Stahl (2006). Responsible Computers? A Case for Ascribing Quasi-Responsibility to Computers Independent of Personhood or Agency. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):205-213.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1972). What Computers Can't Do. Harper and Row.
Eric Dietrich (1988). Computers, Intentionality, and the New Dualism. Computers and Philosophy Newsletter.
Tim van Gelder (1998). Computers and Computation in Cognitive Science. In T.M. Michalewicz (ed.), Advances in Computational Life Sciences Vol.2: Humans to Proteins. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1985). From Socrates to Expert Systems: The Limits and Dangers of Calculative Rationality. In Carl Mitcham & Alois Huning (eds.), Philosophy and Technology II: Information Technology and Computers in Theory and Practice. Reidel.
Sanford C. Goldberg (1997). The Very Idea of Computer Self-Knowledge and Self-Deception. Minds and Machines 7 (4):515-529.
Carl Mitcham & Alois Huning (eds.) (1985). Philosophy and Technology II: Information Technology and Computers in Theory and Practice. Reidel.
Marvin L. Minsky (1982). Why People Think Computers Can't. AI Magazine Fall 1982.
Bernd Carsten Stahl (2004). Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 14 (1):67-83.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads1 ( #306,128 of 1,088,388 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,388 )
How can I increase my downloads?