Challenging the conventional wisdom: Recent proposals for the interpretive study of inequality [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 27 (2):113-136 (2004)
The conventional wisdom among many sociologists is (1) that it is their prerogative to define, document, and explain the inequalities that exist in society and (2) that there are two general theoretical perspectives useful for studying inequality: functionalism and conflict theory. Some scholars have recently challenged the latter portion of this view by advocating the development of more interpretive, interactionist approaches. However, these scholars'' agendas often tend to perpetuate the first half of the conventional wisdom. While interactionists (and other constructionist scholars) can choose to study inequality in any number of ways, I argue that the most distinctive contribution they can make is to focus on the meanings that inequalities have for people in everyday life, as well as how those meanings are achieved.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Modern Philosophy Philosophy of the Social Sciences Political Philosophy Sociolinguistics|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Randall Collins (2000). Situational Stratification: A Micro-Macro Theory of Inequality. Sociological Theory 18 (1):17-43.
Scott R. Harris (2000). The Social Construction of Equality in Everyday Life. Human Studies 23 (4):371-393.
George Psathas (1980). Approaches to the Study of the World of Everyday Life. Human Studies 3 (1):3 - 17.
Thomas C. Anderson (1996). Editor's Introduction. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70 (4):461-465.
Patricia Hill Collins (1991/2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maarten De Rijke (1992). The Modal Logic of Inequality. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):566 - 584.
Wiemer Salverda, Brian Nolan & Timothy M. Smeeding (eds.) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. OUP Oxford.
Jeffrey D. Milyo & Jennifer M. Mellor (1999). Is Inequality Bad for Our Health? Critical Review 13 (3-4):359-372.
Yanis Varoufakis (2002). Against Equality. Science and Society 66 (4):448 - 472.
Scott Soames (2007). What Are Natural Kinds? Philosophical Topics 35 (1-2):329-342.
Larry S. Temkin (1986). Inequality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
James W. Haag (2010). The Hefnerian Legacy: Rethinking the "Nature" of Naturalism. Zygon 45 (1):273-280.
Charles R. Pigden (2007). Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom. Episteme 4 (2):219-232.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #440,687 of 1,911,676 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,010 of 1,911,676 )
How can I increase my downloads?