Criticizing the critique. Some methodological insights into the debate on the state of economic theory in the face of the post 2008 crisis
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bank&Credit 41 (4):7-22 (2010)
The aim of this paper is to investigate the current debate on the state of economics from a methodological perspective. We claim that the majority of contributions criticizing modern economics are not based on clear methodological principles and thus many of them are not correct. We show this with respect to such issues as the problem of realisticness of models and their assumptions, the role of mathematics in economics, the way we conceptualize the relation between economics (theory) and economy (empiria), as well as the general problem of comparing theories. In doing so we use the research apparatus taken form the philosophy of science and also we benefit a lot from recent developments in the philosophy of economics. Finally, we show one of the paradoxes of that debate, namely that many critics of economics accuse economists of using the wrong language (mathematics) while they do not use proper language themselves while criticizing economics, namely the apparatus taken from the philosophy of science.
|Keywords||methodology of economics mathematization assumptions theories of explanation global economic crisis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Diane Coyle (2012). The Paradox of Popularity in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):187-192.
Roger E. Backhouse & Matthias Klaes (2009). Applying Economics, Using Evidence. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):139-144.
Francesco Guala (2005). Economics in the Lab: Completeness Vs. Testability. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):185-196.
David Colander (2010). The Economics Profession, the Financial Crisis, and Method. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (4):419-427.
Lukasz Hardt (2011). An Inquiry Into the Explanatory Virtues of Transaction Cost Economics. Journal of Philosophical Economics 5 (1):120-147.
N. Emrah Aydinonat (2012). The Two Images of Economics: Why the Fun Disappears When Difficult Questions Are at Stake? Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):243-258.
Uskali Mäki (1996). Two Portraits of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):1-38.
Daniel M. Hausman (1997). Theory Appraisal in Neoclassical Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2):289-296.
José M. Edwards (2012). The History of the Use of Self-Reports and the Methodology of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4):357-374.
Uskali Mäki (ed.) (2002). Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press.
Steven Rappaport (1996). Abstraction and Unrealistic Assumptions in Economics∗. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):215-236.
Uskali Mäki (2003). 'The Methodology of Positive Economics' (1953) Does Not Give Usthemethodology of Positive Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (4):495-505.
Thomas A. Boylan & Pascal F. O'Gorman (1991). The Critique of Equilibrium Theory in Economic Methodology: A Constructive Empiricist Perspective. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):131 – 142.
Uskali Mäki (ed.) (2001). The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-09-08
Total downloads87 ( #53,864 of 1,941,041 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #133,083 of 1,941,041 )
How can I increase my downloads?