Graduate studies at Western
Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):14 (2006)
|Abstract||Some of the papers in this special issue distribute cognition between what is going on inside individual cognizers' heads and their outside worlds; others distribute cognition among different individual cognizers. Turing's criterion for cognition was individual, autonomous input/output capacity. It is not clear that distributed cognition could pass the Turing Test.|
|Keywords||Autonomy Cognition Distributed Cognition Metaphysics Organism Test Turing Machines|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ronald N. Giere (2007). Distributed Cognition Without Distributed Knowing. Social Epistemology 21 (3):313 – 320.
Pierre Poirier & Guillaume Chicoisne (2006). A Framework for Thinking About Distributed Cognition. Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):215-234.
Robert M. French (1990). Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test. Mind 99 (393):53-66.
Dale Jacquette (1993). Who's Afraid of the Turing Test? Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
B. Jack Copeland (2000). The Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
Krist Vaesen (2011). Giere's (In)Appropriation of Distributed Cognition. Social Epistemology 25 (4):379 - 391.
Joseph Agassi (2003). Newell's List. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):601-602.
Benny Shanon (1989). A Simple Comment Regarding the Turing Test. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (June):249-56.
Stevan Harnad (2005). Distributed Processes, Distributed Cognizers and Collaborative Cognition. [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press) 13 (3):01-514.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #25,359 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,592 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?