Epistemology and Eudaimonism in Augustine's Contra Academicos

Augustinian Studies 37 (2):247-271 (2006)
The paper has two main parts. First, I introduce the eudaimonistic setting of the epistemological discussions in book one and – very briefly – and make a few points about book two. Second, in an analysis of book three, I show how Augustine relieves a tension which was present between the conclusions of books one and two and how the relief of that tension culminates in a critique of the skeptic’s eudaimonistic claims more so than their epistemological ones.
Keywords Augustine  Skepticism  Eudaimonism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/augstudies200637213
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Charles Bolyard (2006). Augustine, Epicurus, and External World Skepticism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):157-168.
Ryan N. S. Topping (2009). The Perils of Skepticism. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):333-350.
Joseph Clair (2013). Wolterstorff on Love and Justice. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):138-167.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #214,392 of 1,938,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #214,500 of 1,938,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.